That would include single-game betting, while Canada currently allows only “parlay” wagering, with a gambler needing to win
all three or more wagers (or all wagers in a larger parlay) to cash in.
Such bets have limited appeal to professional, sophisticated bettors who are aware that “the house” has a much higher rate of return with parlays. In 2020 in New Jersey, for example, the sportsbooks are getting a return of more than 18% on parlays but under 5% on football and basketball.
So once the travel ban on Canadians crossing the border to the U.S. expires when the COVID-19 pandemic sufficiently subsides, the prospect would exist for Canadians to venture over the border into Michigan to make wagers, in the same way that New Yorkers visit neighboring New Jersey just to make mobile bets.
But in a somewhat surprising move, three of the plaintiffs in the unsuccessful 2012 lawsuit to prevent sports betting in New Jersey — the NBA, NHL, and MLB — have joined forces to back the legalization of single-game sports betting in Canada.
Text of the letter by the leagues
“The National Basketball Association, the National Hockey League, Major League Baseball, Major League Soccer, and the Canadian Football League support an amendment to Canada’s federal laws that would authorize provinces to offer betting on single sporting events,” the leagues wrote in a statement last week sent to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and other leading Canadian officials.
“Sports betting gives fans another exciting way to engage with the sports they love. Because a legal and regulated sports betting market in Canada would be beneficial to sports and their fans, we urge prompt action to make this a reality.
“Sports betting already happens illegally in Canada; creating a legal framework would shift consumers from illicit, unregulated markets to a legal and safe marketplace. Regulating single-game betting would allow for strong consumer protections as well as safeguards to further protect the integrity of sports.”
The NFL and NCAA, also parties to the New Jersey lawsuit, did not join in this letter. It comes at a time when the five organizations are continuing to battle New Jersey’s horsemen over whether they owe the horsemen $150 million in damages for “wrongfully enjoining” them from offering sports betting at Monmouth Park.
U.S. District Judge Michael Shipp, who in 2014 issued a temporary restraining order against the sports betting that later was extended, agreed with the leagues that they faced “irreparable harm” if sports betting was permitted outside of Nevada, even for a limited time at a single site near the Jersey Shore.
Leagues pivoted quickly on sports betting
But within weeks of the 2018 Supreme Court ruling allowing any state to offer such gambling, the plaintiffs began entering into lucrative partnerships with gambling companies. None of the leagues have yet claimed “irreparable harm” from more widespread legal gambling.
Supporters of the proposal in Canada are hoping that it can be approved this week. Diminished government revenue due to the pandemic has been cited as a reason to convince fence-sitters that now is the time to reverse a quirk in the country’s gambling laws.
If so, it’s possible that the border-crossing dollars pictured in Michigan’s favor could flow in Ontario’s direction instead for a short time, until Michigan has its mobile sports betting regulations finalized.
Meanwhile, last week the Michigan Gaming and Control Board approved reopening guidelines for its three commercial casinos in Detroit, each of which became home to a physical sportsbook as of March. The casinos are eyeing America’s July 4th Independence Day for official re-openings.
Get MI Online
Subscribe to get the latest MI online gambling news to your inbox.